From the 24-hour news cycle to pop-up ads magically curated to our wants and desires, to product labeling on everything from t-shirts to meat products, the marketing messages we see daily can be overwhelming. This is especially true if you want to make choices that are better for the planet. Being a conscious consumer is hard work. And if the constant self-education weren’t confusing enough, there are companies looking to cash-in on our collective goodwill. As interest in sustainability and a plant-based diet is on the rise so, too, is a practice called “greenwashing.”
What Is Greenwashing?
Greenwashing is when a company gives a false impression that a product is better for the planet than it actually is. It is an attempt to capitalize on the growing demand for environmentally sustainable products, whether that means they are more natural, healthier, free from chemicals, recyclable, or less wasteful of natural resources.
“Greenwashing is all about misdirection, showing one thing that distracts you from what is really going on,” Leyla Acaroglu, an Australian sustainability designer and the 2016 United Nations Environment Programme Champion of the Earth, wrote on Medium.
“The main issue we see is that greenwashing takes up valuable space in the fight against significant environmental issues like climate change, plastic ocean pollutions, air pollution, and global species extinctions,” she continues. “The saddest thing is that many companies do it by accident, as they don’t have the expertise to know what is truly environmentally beneficial, and what is not.”
Greenwashing shows up in a brand’s advertising campaign or marketing copy. They might use buzzwords like “eco-friendly” or “green,” so consumers are misdirected into making what they think is the more sustainable choice. For example, the meat and dairy industry often uses labels such as “sustainable,” “ethical,” and “free-range,” to communicate a sense of kindness and responsibility. However, no matter how meat and dairy products are produced–whether factory-farmed or “grass-fed,” the negative environmental impact is undeniable. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, animal agriculture is responsible for 14.5 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions.
Greenwashing can also look like a label stating that packaging is “made with recycled materials” or that a snack is made with “sustainably sourced ingredients.” A company might also claim that it incorporates “sustainable” business practices without providing information on how it’s reducing its environmental impact. Greenwashing can apply to all products, from household and beauty to fashion and food.
The Federal Trade Commission has attempted to curb false eco-friendly claims with its Green Guides, but greenwashing still persists and stricter laws are left to state governments. For example, California has a law against plastics labeled “biodegradable” and “compostable” because these claims are not often backed by substantiated evidence about how they’re better for the environment.
How to Spot Greenwashing and Make Informed Consumer Choices
So, what does greenwashing look like? Marketing firm TerraChoice outlined the six “sins” of greenwashing in 2007 and uncovered how common it is: of the 1,018 products bearing environmental claims it reviewed for the report, only one committed none of the “sins.” Here’s what to look out for when you go shopping:
1. Trading Off Benefits
This can look like companies claiming to use recycled materials in their packaging without addressing what the company itself is doing to reduce its impact. Even industries that are already better for the planet than the alternative, like vegan food and fashion, can take steps toward being more environmentally friendly. This can include moving toward a closed-loop system, where businesses reuse materials in order to create new products. Some companies, like Tofurky, are converting to solar energy or other renewable sources. Many brands will put this information on their website. A Certified B Corporation logo is also a good sign. Certified B Corporations “are businesses that meet the highest standards of verified social and environmental performance, public transparency, and legal accountability to balance profit and purpose,” according to the website.
2. Unsubstantiated Environmental Claims
This can include claims such as “made from recycled materials” or that the company is sourcing the most eco-friendly ingredients possible with no proof of where they come from. It can also apply to lamps and light bulbs that claim to be energy efficient but don’t have an Energy Star certification on the label. Look for companies that are transparent about their claims. Many sustainable brands will have detailed sections on the website explaining their sourcing practices.
This can cross over into animal welfare, too, like if your bodywash claims to be “not tested on animals” without any sort of certification, like Cruelty Free International’s Leaping Bunny logo or PETA’s Beauty Without Bunnies.
3. Irrelevant Call-Outs on Packaging
This is when companies make claims for the sake of looking better than other options. A good example is chlorofluorocarbons (CFC), a chemical that contributes to ozone depletion that has been banned for 30 years. Because it’s CFC is already illegal, companies that put “CFC-free” on the packaging are making an irrelevant claim. This is the most common in disinfectants, insecticides, and lubricants. An example of this happening in food would be putting “cholesterol-free” on peanut butter. Plant-based foods are free from and help lower cholesterol. While it’s true that peanut butter is cholesterol-free, it’s not unique.
4. Vague Language and Wording
This is when a company’s broad claim is poorly defined: non-toxic, all-natural (many harmful things, like arsenic, are natural). Another example of this is a company calling out the use of “plant-based” ingredients on the packaging with colors that signal eco-friendliness. In 2015, Kimberly Clark, the parent company to disposable diaper brand Huggies, was sued for using misleading claims on its “Pure & Natural” range. The diapers featured green-colored packaging and called out the use of organic cotton. However, this was only present on the outside of diapers.
According to the lawsuit, the product was not “pure and natural,” as it contained potentially harmful ingredients including polypropylene and sodium polyacrylate. Additionally, the packaging was made from only 20 percent post-consumer materials. However, the name of the range and the visuals used sent the signal to customers that the Pure & Natural range was sustainable.
This carries over to the grocery store aisles. Meat producer Tyson has a “Naturals” range that features a logo with a green leaf, symbolizing the product’s supposed natural origins. The packaging suggests that the fact that hens raised with “no antibiotics” are natural. The modern chicken is unrecognizable from the birds of about 60 years ago due to being genetically modified to grow larger faster. Broiler hens used to weigh just under two pounds. Now, the average hen weighs about nine pounds. As a result, chickens of today are often in constant pain, according to a study from the University of Guelph.
The packaging of the Naturals range also claims that the product contains “no added hormones or steroids**”
But, in the left corner, it clearly states: “**Federal regulations prohibit the use of added hormones or steroids in chickens,” bringing us back to point number three: irrelevant call-outs.
The phrases “chemical-free” (everything is made from chemicals), “non-toxic” (everything is toxic with the right dosage, even water), “green,” “eco-friendly,” and “eco-conscious” are other examples of vagueness.
Check the packaging and website for the appropriate certifications attached to these claims.
5. The Lesser of Two Evils
These are eco-friendly claims on products that are environmentally destructive, like organic tobacco or green pesticides. Rayon viscose, a fabric made from plant cellulose (usually bamboo), is another example. You might think it’s sustainable because plants are a renewable resource and therefore, it’s better for the planet than cotton, but it’s processed using harmful chemicals like sodium hydroxide, carbon disulfide, and sulphuric acid. These are often dumped into local waterways, which is harmful to the local communities. Working with these chemicals is also hazardous to employees–rayon isn’t made in the U.S. because the chemicals involved are too toxic to comply with EPA standards.
6. Outright Lies
When a company makes claims that are outright false. This could mean claiming to be energy efficient when evidence suggests otherwise or misuse of labels like “organic”. According to TerraChoice’s Six Sins of Marketing, this claim can be the trickiest to identify. The most frequent example is the misuse of third-party certifications, such as the Forest Stewardship Council or Green Guard. Verifying this is easy; legitimate third-party certifiers will maintain a list of products that have received the seal of approval.
What’s the Harm?
Greenwashing can be dangerous because it tricks well-meaning consumers into making purchases that they believe are better for the environment.
“Whilst some greenwashing is unintentional and results from a lack of knowledge about what sustainability truly is, it is often intentionally carried out through a wide range of marketing and PR efforts,” writes Acaroglu. “But the common denominator among all greenwashing is that it is not only misleading, but it’s also really not helping to further sustainable design or circular economy initiatives. Thus, environmental problems stay the same or more likely, get even worse, as greenwashing often sucks up airtime and misdirects well-intentioned consumers down the wrong path.”
So, how can you be a savvy, eco-conscious consumer?
How to Identify Greenwashing
Before you buy, read the company website and pay careful attention to the language used. A company’s information (or lack thereof) of how they operate behind the scenes can be revealing. Keep these questions in mind while you read. When the company says that it uses sustainably sourced ingredients, is that backed by any official certification? Is it transparent about their practices for managing excess materials and waste? Is it recycling or using post-consumer materials for packaging? What are its plans for becoming more environmentally friendly? Is it moving toward a closed-loop system or converting to renewable energy? Can it provide evidence that it has taken action on any of its plans?
Until labeling laws are stricter on claims like “green,” “eco-friendly,” or “sustainable,” it’s important for us as consumers to stay skeptical and do the best that we can to look into a company’s practices.
Credit: Source link